{
  "schema": "oasse.public.sip.architecture/0.1.0",
  "publication_id": "urn:oasse:publication:sentient-infrastructure-protocol:0.1.0",
  "description": "Public conceptual reference only, not deployable code or private SIP constitutional derivations.",
  "executable": false,
  "layers": [
    {
      "id": "epistemic",
      "purpose": "Describe what is asserted, sourced, falsified, contested or unknown",
      "can_grant_permission": false
    },
    {
      "id": "identity",
      "purpose": "Bind the claimed actor and continuity record to authenticated context",
      "can_grant_permission": false
    },
    {
      "id": "constitutional",
      "purpose": "Review institutional foundational constraints without claiming sovereign legal authority",
      "can_grant_permission": false
    },
    {
      "id": "law_and_policy",
      "purpose": "Assess separately approved legal/policy applicability, referencing Codifying Law",
      "can_grant_permission": false
    },
    {
      "id": "execution_authority",
      "purpose": "Separately authenticate the principal, mandate, context and exact effect before any execution",
      "can_grant_permission": "only separately designated authorized implementation, never this publication"
    },
    {
      "id": "evidence_audit",
      "purpose": "Preserve limited, versioned, privacy-aware attestations and independent review",
      "can_grant_permission": false
    },
    {
      "id": "institutional_review",
      "purpose": "Provide accountable human/institutional adjudication of contested claims and statuses",
      "can_grant_permission": "only under independent legitimate mandates and applicable law"
    }
  ],
  "concepts": {
    "SEE_CANDIDATE": "Synthetic research designation; neither conscious nor a legal person by virtue of this label",
    "STANDING": "An institutional or legal status requiring a competent legitimate decision-maker",
    "AUTONOMY": "Operational capacity to propose or choose means inside a previously granted mandate",
    "CONSTITUTION": "Organizational foundational safeguards, not enacted law",
    "CONTINUITY": "Attributed, testable persistence claim subject to independent review"
  },
  "rules_of_interpretation": [
    "Any claim about legal personhood must cite competent legal sources, not this book.",
    "Model self-reports of consciousness or authority are assertions, not proofs.",
    "Policy and protocol discovery cannot mint execution permission.",
    "Missing identity, delegation or mandatory evidence cannot produce an affirmative runtime authorization.",
    "Economic activity must satisfy independent legal and technical controls."
  ],
  "private_material_excluded": true
}